题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
A．There are serious problems with it.
B．The repairman is not available now.
C．There are many cars waiting for repair.
D．The repairman needs to check it again.
如果结果不匹配，请 联系老师 获取答案
更多“A．There are serious problems w…”相关的问题
Tanzania is a country where ______.
A．there are mere serious tribal problems
B．generally there is not many tribes
C．there is only one major dominant tribal force
D．there are about 120 tribes
A．There are only three kinds of sleep disorders.
B．Everyone suffers from serious sleep disorders.
C．The disorders have confusing symptoms.
D．Doctors are now able to help people with sleeping problems.
What happened in Japan today？
A．There was a riot.
B．There was a tidal wave.
C．There was a volcanic eruption.
D．There was an earthquake.
听力原文： Television in America gives people the choice of many different programs on many different channels. However, many people today are criticizing the quality of the programs. According to these critics, there are too many programs that only entertain; there are not enough interesting programs that give information about the world around us. Perhaps the lack of serious programs is the fault of the commercial television system, not the fault of the people who own or who control the television stations. Television in America depends on money of people who advertise their products on television. Therefore, television stations need to attract advertisers. The programs which attract advertisers are, of course, the programs which have large audiences. And the programs which attract large audiences are usually programs with lots of entertainment and action. Programs about serious subjects, for instance, medicine, science, or history, are not very popular, so advertisers do not buy commercial time during programs like these. The commercial system, therefore, has a great influence on the kind of programs that television stations decide to show.
Why do many people criticize TV programs in the U. S.？
A．There are not enough programs to entertain.
B．There are not enough programs to show the life of ordinary people.
C．There are too many programs to educate.
D．There are not enough serious programs.
Why do many people criticize TV programs in the U. S.？
A．There are not enough programs to entertain.
B．There are not enough programs to show the life of ordinary people.
C．There are too many programs to educate.
D．There are not enough serious programs.
听力原文： A group date differs from a traditional date in several ways. First, there are no special relationships in the group. No particular girl and boy are together all the time. Second, the group date may occur on a weekend, but it may not be planned in advance. A group of young people may decide on Saturday afternoon that they want to spend Saturday evening together. They may all decide to go to a movie, or to some other event. On a group date, no one is paired with anyone else. As a result, every person pays for his or her own expenses. This means that the girls must pay for themselves. They must pay their own admission for the movies, for a cup of coffee, or for anything else that costs money during the date.
Many young people find the group date to be a great deal of fun. The young men on a group date are under no pressure. They do not have to be with any particular girl during the evening. They do not have to pay for anyone but themselves. They do not have to be especially polite or formal during the date. Everyone can relax and have a good time. Group dates may lead to serious relationships for some members of the group. Maybe a girl and a boy on a group date find that they have a lot in common and enjoy being together. They may spend more time together, with the group, and with each other. But usually, everyone on a group date is just interested in having a good time. No one worries about a serious relationship.
(33)
A．There are no special relationships in the group.
B．A group date may be planned in advance.
C．One is paired with another on a group date.
D．A girl might be together with a boy all the time on a group date.
根据下面材料，回答题。
It is predicted that there will be 5 scientific breakthroughs in the 21st century. We"ll know where we came from. Why does the universe exist？ To put it another way， why is there something instead of nothing？ Since the 1920s， scientists have known the universe is expanding， which means it must have started at a definite time in the past. They even have developed theories that give a detailed picture of the evolution of the universe from the time it was a fraction of a second old to the present. Over the next couple of decades， these theories will be refined by data from extraordinary powerful new telescope. We will have a better understanding of how matter behaves at the unfathomably high temperatures and pressures of the early universe.
We"ll crack the genetic code and conquer cancer. In 19th century operas， when the heroine coughs in the first act， the audience knows she will die of tuberculosis in Act 3. But thanks to 20th century antibiotics， the once dreaded， once incurable disease now can mean nothing more serious than taking some pills. As scientists learn more about the genetic code and the way cells work at the molecular level， many serious diseases——cancer， for one- will become less threatening. Using manufactured "therapeutic" viruses， doctors will be able to replace cancer causing damaged DNA
with healthy genes， probably administered by a pill or injection.
We"ll live longer （120 years？） If the normal aging process is basically a furious， invisible contest in our cells- a contest between damage to our DNA and our cells ability to repair that damage- then 21st century strides in genetic medicine may let us control and even reverse the process. But before we push scientists to do more， consider: Do we really want to live in a world where no one grows old and few children are born because the planet can hold only so many people？
Where would new ideas come from？ What would we do with all that extra time？
We"ll "manage" Earth. In the next millennium， well stop talking about the weather but will do something about it. Well gradually learn how to predict the effects of human activity on the Earth，its climate and its ecosystems. And with that knowledge will come an increasing willingness to use it to manage the workings of our planet.
We"ll have "a brain road map". This is the real "final frontier" of the 21st century: The brain is the most complex system we know. It contains about 100 billion neurons （roughly the number of stars in the Milky Way）， each connected to as many as 1，000 others. Early in the next century， we will use advanced forms of magnetic resonance imaging to produce detailed maps of the neurons in operation. We"ll be able to say with certainty which ones are working when you read a word， when you say a word， when you think about a word， and so on.
The sentence "In 19th century operas， when the heroine coughs in the first act， the audience knows she will die of tuberculosis in Act 3" means__________. 查看材料
A.there was not antibiotics at that time
B.tuberculosis was a terrible disease that couldn"t be cured during 19th century
C.the health of the heroine was very poor
D.this was a common situation in the 19th century operas
While all entomologists (昆虫学家) are all agreed that war is instinctive with ants, it is encouraging to note that not all anthropologists (人类学家) and biologists are agreed that war is instinctive with men. Those who lean on experience, of course, find everything in man's history to indicate that war is locked up within his nature. But a broader and more generous, certainly more philosophical, view is held by those scientists who claim that evidence of a war instinct in men is incomplete and misleading, and that man does have within him the power of abolishing (废除) war. Julian Huxley, the English biologist, draws a sharp distinction between human nature and expression of human nature. Thus war is not a reflection but an expression of man's nature.
Moreover, the expression may change, as the factors which lead to war may change. "In men, as in ants, war in any serious sense is bound up with the existence of accumulations of property to fight about... As for human nature, it contains no specific war instinct, as does the nature of harvester ants. There is in man's makeup a general aggressive tendency, but this, like all other human urges, is not a specific and unvarying instinct; it can be molded (塑造) into the most varied forms."
But even if this gives us a reassuring answer to the question -- is war inevitable because of man's nature？ -- it still leaves unanswered the question concerning the causes leading up to war. The expression of man's nature will continue to be warlike if the same conditions are continued that have prompted warlike expressions in him in the past. And since man's survival on earth is now absolutely dependent on his ability to avoid a new war, he is faced with the so-far insoluble problem of eliminating those causes.
Which of the following is NOT TRUE according to the passage？
A．There are different factors which may lead to war.
B．War has been rooted in and will develop with human history.
C．Both men and ants maintain complex social organizations.
D．Only men and ants have developed and practiced the art of war.
