题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
[主观题]
Intelligence tests could be used for streaming children__________
查看答案
如果结果不匹配，请 联系老师 获取答案
题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
如果结果不匹配，请 联系老师 获取答案
题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
如果结果不匹配，请 联系老师 获取答案
更多“Intelligence tests could be us…”相关的问题
Intelligence tests have now been proved to be unreliable.
A．Y
B．N
C．NG
The ideal criteria in using intelligence tests for predication should be ______.
A．accurate college tests
B．objective and reliable achievement tests
C．objective and reliable intelligence tests
D．a series of objective multiple choices
Intelligence tests showed that______.
A．bright children were unlikely to be mentally healthy
B．between childhood and adulthood there was a considerable loss of intelligence
C．talented children were most likely to become gifted adults
D．when talented children grew into adults, they made low scores
The passage suggests that ______.
A．one's intelligence is born by nature
B．people can be trained to make best use of their mental abilities
C．IQ tests are totally unreliable
D．most psychologists are in favor of the idea of "self-efficacy"
What can be inferred from the second paragraph？
A．Ideal criteria for objective and reliable achievement tests in college courses ate hard to find.
B．Intelligence test scores can accurately predict the degree of academic success.
C．The correlations between intelligence tests and achievement tests are lowest in college courses.
D．The high correlations between intelligence tests and achievement tests in secondary school gain universal recognition.
A．intelligence tests have come to be seen rightly or wrongly
B．intelligence tests have become primarily a tool for selecting people
C．intelligence tests have become an irritating test
D．intelligence tests can hardly justify one's intellect
Early intelligence tests were not without their critics. Many enduring concerns were first raised by the influential journalist Walter Lippman, in a series of published debates with Lewis Terman, of Stanford University, the father of IQ testing in America. Lippman pointed out the superficiality of the questions, their possible cultural biases, and the risks of trying to determine a person's intellectual potential with a brief oral or paper-and-pencil measure.
Perhaps surprisingly, the conceptualization of intelligence did not advance much in the decades following Terman's pioneering contributions. Intelligence tests came to be seen, rightly or wrongly, as primarily a tool for selecting people to fill academic or vocational niches. In one of the most famous -- if irritating -- remarks about intelligence testing, the influential Harvard psychologist E. G. Boring declared, "intelligence is what the tests test." So long as these tests did what they were supposed to do(that is, give some indication of school success), it did not seem necessary or prudent to probe too deeply into their meaning or to explore alternative views of the human intellect.
Psychologists who study intelligence have argued chiefly about two questions. The first: Is intelligence singular, or does it consist of various more or less independent intellectual faculties？ The purists -- ranging from the turn-of-the-century English psychologist Charles Spearman to his latter-day disciples Richard J. Herrntein and Charles Murray -- defend the notion of a single overarching "g", or general intelligence. The pluralists -- ranging from L. L. Thurstone, of the University of Chicago, who posited seven vectors of the mind, to J. P. Guilford, of the University of Southern California, who discerned 150 factors of the intellect-construe intelligence as composed of some or even many dissociable components.
The public is more interested in the second question: Is intelligence (or are intelligences) largely inherited.'？ This is by and large a Western question. In the Confucian societies of East Asia individual differences in endowment are assumed to be modest, and differences in achievement are thought to be due largely to effort. In the West, however, many students of the subject sympathize with the view -- defended within psychology by Lewis Terman, among others -- that intelligence is inborn and one can do little to alter one's intellectual birthright.
Studies of identical twins reared apart provide surprisingly strong support for the "heritability" of psychometric intelligence. That is, if one wants to predict someone's score on an intelligence test, the scores of the biological parents (even if the child has not had appreciable contact with them) are more likely to prove relevant than the scores of the adoptive parents. By the same token, the IQs of identical twins are more similar than the IQs of fraternal twins. And, contrary to common sense, the IQs of biologically related people grow closer in the later years of life.
Paragraph 1 of this passage suggests that ______.
A．intelligence tests are criticized by many people
B．Walter Lippman is an influential journalist
C．Lewis Terman of Stanford University is the father of IQ testing in America
D．Walter Lippman suspects the authenticity of IQ testing
The basic purpose of IQ tests is to______.
A．measure children"s intelligence
B．test linguistic and numerical skills
C．test why some children perform. better at school
D．find out why some children are not appreciated
What can be inferred about intelligence testing from Paragraph 3？
A．People no longer use IQ scores as an indicator of intelligence.
B．More versions of IQ tests are now available on the Internet.
C．The test contents and formats for adults and children may be different.
D．Scientists have defined the important elements of human intelligence.
A.Most intelligent people do well on some intelligence tests.
B.People doing well on one type of intelligence test do well on other tests.
C.Intelligent people do not do well on group tests.
D.Intelligent people do better on written tests than on oral tests.
