The word "litigants" means most nearly ______.A.jury membersB.commentatorsC.parties in a l
The word "litigants" means most nearly ______.
A.jury members
B.commentators
C.parties in a lawsuit
D.taxpayers
The word "litigants" means most nearly ______.
A.jury members
B.commentators
C.parties in a lawsuit
D.taxpayers
The word "litigants" (Line 2, Para. 1 ) means most nearly ______.
A.jury members
B.commentators
C.parties in a lawsuit
D.taxpayers
A.judges
B.attorneys
C.persons concerned in a lawsuit
D.government officials
A.different trial court in the same state
B.court in a different geographic region
C.federal trial court
D.state supreme court
Which of the following is true about small-claims courts?
A.It is possible to have one's case heard by a jury if he or she is dissatisfied with the court's decision.
B.The decision may not be appealed to a higher court.
C.The litigants must plead accurately and according to a strict form.
D.The parties may not present their cases without a lawyer's help.
One suggestion that has been made in order to maximize the efficiency of the system is to allow districts that have an overabundance of pending cases to borrow judges from other districts that do not have such a workload. Another suggestion is to use pretrial conferences, in which the judge meets in his chambers with the litigants and their lawyers in order to narrow the issues, limit the witnesses, and provide for a more orderly trial. The theory behind pretrial conferences is that judges will spend less time on each case and parties will more readily settle before trial when they realize the adequacy of their claims and their opponents' evidence. Unfortunately, at least one study has shown that pretrial conferences actually use more judicial time than they save, rarely result in pretrial settlements, and actually result in higher damage settlements.
Many states have now established another method, small-claims courts, in which cases over small sums of money can be disposed of with considerable dispatch. Such proceedings cost the litigants almost nothing. In California, for example, the parties must appear before the judge without the assistance of counsel. The proceedings are quite informal and there is no pleading--the litigants need to make only a one-sentence statement of their claim. By going to this type of court, the plaintiff(原告) gives up any right to a jury trial and the right to appeal the decision.
In coming years, we can expect to see more and more innovations in the continuing effort to correct a situation which must be corrected if the citizens who have valid claims are going to be able to have their day in court.
The pretrial conference, in theory, is supposed to do all of the following EXCEPT ______.
A.narrow the issues
B.cause early settlements
C.save judicial time
D.increase settlement costs
Which of the following is true?
A.Lawsuit costs are usually quite high both for the taxpayers and the litigants.
B.To use pretrial conferences proves to be quite feasible in maximizing the efficiency of the judicial system in US.
C.At present, most litigants prefer small-claims courts in US because cases can be settled with considerable dispatch.
D.It is possible to have one' s case heard by a jury if the litigant is not satisfied with the small-claims court' s decision.
Thus, the typical court case begins in a trail count—a court of general jurisdiction—in the state or federal system. Most cases go to further than the trial court; for example, the criminal defendant is convicted (by a trial or a guilty plea)and sentenced by the court and the case ends; the personal injury suit results in a judgment by a trail court (or an out-of-court settlement by the parties while the court suit is pending)and the parties leave the court sys- tem. But sometimes the losing party at the trial court cares enough about the cause that the matter does not end there. In these cases, the "loser" at the trial court may appeal to the next higher court.
According to the passage, district courts are also known as______.
A.circuit courts
B.supreme courts
C.intemediate courts
D.trial courts
What does the passage mainly discuss?
A.Civil and criminal courts.
B.Typical court cases.
C.The court system in US.
D.The appeal court process.