题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
Question 1
三十岁的Chan作为发型师受雇于位于Nathan路的ABC沙龙，聘用合同包括这样的条款：雇佣合同终止后的15年内，他不能在香港的任何地方从事发型师的工作，而且也不能参与其他任何与 ABC沙龙的美发竞争有关的行业。
讨论该条款的效力。
如果结果不匹配，请 联系老师 获取答案
更多“Question 1 三十岁的Chan作为发型师受雇于位于N…”相关的问题
Question 1
ABC Co Ltd登出货物供应招标的广告。Chan提交了按“你方可能订购的数量”供货的提议。 ABC Co Ltd接受了Chart的提议，并且完成了几笔订购交易。6个月后，Chan想撤回协议。给Chan一些建议。
Question 1
Au以广告形式发出要约将给任何返还他自行车的人5000美元。Chan发现了自行车，并且送给Au，但事先并末听说有赏金。Chan有权得到5000美元吗？
Question 1
Chan欠Lee l000美元，但说他到期只能还800美元。lee同意接受800美元清偿债务。随后 Lee能起诉支付其余的200美元吗？
Question 1
Chan想转让他的生意，Lee很感兴趣。在1月份谈判期间，Chan照实说他的生意每年可收益 500000美元，在6月份签订合同时，因Chan生病，生意的收益降为每月1000美元。Chan在签订合同时未将此情形说明。
讨论Lee能否取消合同。
Question 1
Chan同意将商品出售给Lee，并在文件中写明：“这一要约在星期五上午10点钟之前有效，承诺要通过邮寄发出。”星期四Chan与Wong签订合同出售该商品。Chan写信给Lee要撤销要约。撤销信在星期六上午11点到达Lee。星期五上午9点Lee发出了承诺信且该信在星期四下午4点钟到达 Chan。
Lee．能够起诉Chan违约吗？
Question 1
简述下列情形是否构成侵占：
(1)仓库管理员因其善意之错误，将东西交付错了。
(2)受寄托人在无真正主人通知的情况下，将东西交还给送来的人。
(3)Chan错误地将Lee的书从某地方挪到另一地方，没有占有或剥夺Lee占有此书的意图。
(1986年9月)
Question 4
Chan promised to pay his nephew ＄5,000 if his nephew would refrain from drinking liquor and using tobacco until the nephew should be 21 years of age. The nephew took Chan's words seriously, and abandoned drinking and smoking. After the nephew celebrated his 21st birthday, he asked Chan to pay the amount promised, Chan refused.
Could the nephew sue Chan for breach of the contract？
Question 4
Chan wanted to sell his business in which Lee was interested. During the course of negotiations in January, Chan correctly represented the takings to be about ＄40,000 a month.
The contract was not signed until June when takings had fallen to ＄1,000 a month owing to Chan's illness. Chan did not mention the drop when the contract was entered into in June.
Can Lee rescind the contract？
By saying "It's not much"(Line 1, Para. 1), the author means that Chan's flat ______.
A．is cheap
B．has cheap furniture
C．has a simple design
D．is fairly small
